Skip to content
Enjoy 20% off for 12 months on all plans. Use promo code: HYPERGROWTHClaim it

How to Find Low Competition Keywords You Can Actually Rank For: The 5-Step Way

SearchBlueprint · · 8 min read · scored 92/100

Close-up of notebook with SEO terms and keywords, highlighting digital marketing strategy.

The most reliable answer to how to find low competition keywords you can actually rank for is to judge the search results page, not a difficulty score: look for weak or mismatched pages ranking on page one, confirm the query fits your site's existing authority, then prioritize by how fast you can win versus how much the traffic is worth.

That sounds simple. In practice, most people skip the SERP check, chase a "KD 5" number from a tool, and publish into a results page full of entrenched brands anyway. This guide walks through the full workflow, where the ideas come from, how to verify a keyword is genuinely winnable for your site, and how to score a shortlist so you're always writing the highest-leverage piece next.

Key Takeaways

  • "Low competition" is relative to your site. A keyword that's easy for an established store may be impossible for a three-month-old blog.
  • Tool difficulty scores are a first filter, not a verdict. Always inspect the actual page-one results before committing.
  • The strongest signals of a winnable keyword are forum threads, thin pages, off-topic results, and outdated content ranking on page one.
  • Score candidates on winnability, business value, and effort, then work the list top-down instead of writing whatever feels interesting.
  • Track rankings from day one so you learn which pockets of keywords your site wins, and double down there.

What "Low Competition" Actually Means

A low competition keyword is a query where the current page-one results are beatable by a page you can realistically produce, because the ranking pages are weak, off-intent, outdated, or from sites no stronger than yours. It is not simply a keyword with a low difficulty score in a tool.

Difficulty scores in most tools are calculated mainly from backlink profiles of the ranking pages. They ignore content quality, intent match, and freshness, three things you can beat without a single new link. That's why two keywords with the same score can be night-and-day different in real winnability.

There's a second half to the definition people miss: low competition is relative to your site. If your domain already ranks for related terms, Google has some trust in you on that topic, and moderately competitive keywords come into reach. If you're starting from zero, you want queries so specific that big sites haven't bothered. If you're new to how authority, relevance, and intent interact, the fundamentals are covered in our beginner's guide to keyword research.

How to Find Low Competition Keywords: The 5-Step Workflow

Step 1: Start from topics where you already have a foothold

Open Google Search Console and look at queries where you rank in positions 5–30; Google's own performance report documentation explains exactly how these query, position, and click figures are measured. Those are topics Google already associates with your site. Long-tail variations of them are your warmest low competition keywords, because you're not starting from zero authority.

No rankings yet? Start from customer language instead: support emails, sales calls, reviews of competitor products. Real customer phrasing is almost always longer-tail and less contested than the terms a tool suggests first.

Step 2: Expand with modifiers that filter out big competitors

Large sites chase head terms. You lower competition by adding specificity, audience, situation, comparison, or constraint. Each modifier type shrinks the pool of competing pages in a predictable way:

Modifier type Example pattern Why competition drops Best for
Audience "CRM for solo real estate agents" Big brands target the generic term, not the niche buyer Product and service pages
Comparison "X vs Y for small teams" Requires specific knowledge of both options; generic sites skip it Bottom-of-funnel blog posts
Problem/symptom "why is my [tool] doing [thing]" Only forums and docs usually answer it Support-style content that builds topical authority
Constraint "under $50", "without coding", "for beginners" Adds a qualifier most existing pages don't address Buying guides and tutorials
Local/situational "[service] for home offices" Narrows intent past what national players cover Service businesses

A competitor keyword gap analysis is the other high-yield expansion method: find keywords where similar-sized rivals rank but you don't. If a site with comparable authority ranks for a term, that term is by definition winnable at your level.

Step 3: Read the SERP before you trust any score

This is the step that separates keywords you can actually rank for from keywords a tool merely labeled "easy." Search the query in an incognito window and look for these signals:

Page-one signal What it tells you Winnability Your move
Reddit, Quora, or forum threads ranking Google found no dedicated page worth ranking Very high Write the dedicated, well-structured answer that doesn't exist
Thin or generic pages (a few hundred words, no depth) Nobody has invested in this query High Out-cover them with specifics, examples, and structure
Off-intent results (e.g., product pages for an informational query) Google is compromising for lack of a match High Match the intent exactly
Visibly outdated content (old years in titles, stale advice) The topic moved on; the pages didn't Moderate–high Publish the current answer and keep it updated
Established brands with deep, well-linked pages The score lied; this is contested Low Skip it, or find a narrower variation

One caveat: forum results are sometimes on page one because Google is deliberately surfacing discussion for that query type. If the entire SERP is threads and the query is opinion-seeking ("is X worth it reddit"), a standard article may struggle. Mixed SERPs, one thread, several weak articles, are the sweet spot.

Step 4: Score and prioritize your shortlist

Once you have 30–50 verified candidates, score each one on three dimensions so the list orders itself:

  1. Winnability, how weak is the SERP relative to your site? (Weight this heaviest.)
  2. Business value, does this query attract someone who could become a customer, or just a reader?
  3. Effort, can you cover it properly in one focused piece, or does it need a content cluster first?

A simple 1–5 rating on each, multiplied together, is enough. The point isn't precision, it's forcing yourself to write the winnable, valuable pieces before the interesting ones. Assign exactly one primary keyword per page; two pages chasing the same term split your relevance and often neither ranks well.

Step 5: Publish, track, and feed wins back into research

Low competition keywords typically show movement faster than contested terms, sometimes within weeks rather than many months, which makes them your feedback loop. Track positions weekly. When a page reaches the top ten, mine Search Console for the extra queries it picked up: those are pre-validated low competition keywords for your next batch. If reading ranking data feels opaque, this walkthrough on understanding an SEO report without technical skills shows exactly which numbers matter and which are noise.

Google's own guidance in its creating helpful content documentation reinforces why this workflow works: pages that demonstrably serve the searcher better than what's ranking are the pages the system is designed to reward. Weak SERPs are simply the places where "better" is easiest to achieve.

Do You Need Paid Tools for This?

No, not to start. Google Autocomplete, which Google confirms is built from real searches people run, plus People Also Ask, Search Console, and manual SERP inspection cover idea generation and verification for free. What paid platforms add is scale: bulk difficulty filtering, competitor keyword databases, and tracking hundreds of terms without spreadsheets. The honest breakdown of where free stops being enough is in our comparison of free versus paid SEO tools.

A practical middle path: use free methods to build and verify your first shortlist, publish 10–15 pieces, and only invest in paid tooling once you have ranking data proving the approach works on your site.

Woman in blue shirt with 'I hope you find peace' text, seated outdoors.

Mistakes That Quietly Kill the Strategy

  • Trusting the score, skipping the SERP. The single most common failure. Difficulty metrics miss intent mismatch and content weakness, the two things that make keywords winnable.
  • Ignoring search intent. Ranking is worthless if your commercial page targets an informational query. Match what page one is already rewarding.
  • Chasing zero-volume ghosts exclusively. Ultra-long-tail terms are winnable but can add up to almost nothing. Balance the list with moderate-volume terms you'll grow into.
  • Scattering topics. Ten posts across ten unrelated topics build authority in none. Cluster your low competition keywords around two or three themes so each win compounds.
  • Publishing and forgetting. Winnable SERPs are winnable for your competitors too. Refresh pages that slip, especially ones ranking positions 4–10.

FAQs

How many low competition keywords should I target at once?

Build a shortlist of 30–50 verified candidates, but work them in batches of 10–15 pieces clustered around one or two topics. Clustering builds topical authority faster than scattering the same effort across unrelated queries.

What difficulty score counts as "low competition"?

There's no universal threshold because every tool calculates it differently and scores ignore your site's own authority. Treat low scores as candidates to verify, then let the actual page-one results, thin pages, forums, outdated content, make the final call.

Can a brand-new website rank for low competition keywords?

Yes, and it's essentially the only viable strategy for a new site. Focus on highly specific long-tail queries where page one shows forum threads or thin content, since those SERPs don't require established authority to enter.

How long does it take to rank for a low competition keyword?

Typically faster than contested terms, movement often appears within weeks, though it varies with your site's authority and how well the page matches intent. Contested keywords can take many months or never move at all.

Are zero-search-volume keywords worth targeting?

Sometimes. Tools underreport long-tail volume, and a page targeting one "zero-volume" query often ranks for dozens of related phrasings. Use them to fill out clusters, but don't build the entire strategy on them alone.

Run Your First Winnability Check This Week

Pick five keywords from your Search Console queries sitting in positions 5–30, search each one, and score the SERPs against the signals table above, you'll likely find at least one page-one opening, and that, in miniature, is how to find low competition keywords you can actually rank for within your current authority. If you'd rather see how that analysis looks when it's done for you, browse a sample SEO report from SearchBlueprint and talk to the team about mapping your own keyword pipeline.

See what this looks like on your own sitePaste a URL and SearchBlueprint scores it on the same content engine that scored this article, then names the fixes in the order they pay off.Get your free plan

Resources / References

  1. performance report documentation
  2. creating helpful content documentation
  3. built from real searches people run

About the author

SearchBlueprint researched, wrote and scored this article with the content pipeline our customers run on their own sites. The score in the byline is what our content engine gave this page before it published. Nothing here is reviewed by hand, which is the point: it is the product's output, published where anyone can check it.